Your Cart

Your cart is empty.

The 7 Abuses: What the Reformation Actually Objected To

Rev. C•D•F• Warrington, M.Div.
By Rev. C•D•F• Warrington, M.Div.

Ordained Minister, M.Div.

April 18, 2026

3 min read

Seven abuses the Protestant Reformation objected to in the medieval church

When people think of the Reformation, they often think of abstract theology — justification, grace, faith. But the second part of the Augsburg Confession is about something more concrete: specific practices in the church that the Lutherans had changed, and why. These seven articles on abuses reveal that the Reformation was not just a theological revolution but a pastoral one.

Article XXII: Communion in Both Kinds

The first abuse addressed is the withholding of the cup from the laity. In medieval practice, the congregation received only the bread; only the priest drank from the cup. The Lutherans restored communion in both kinds — bread and wine — to all communicants, arguing this was the clear practice of the New Testament and the early church.

Article XXIII: The Marriage of Priests

The Confession defends the right of clergy to marry. Enforced celibacy, Melanchthon argued, was a human tradition without scriptural basis, and its requirement had led to widespread scandal and sin. The Lutherans permitted — and encouraged — clergy to marry, following what they saw as the clear teaching of St. Paul.

Articles XXIV–XXVI: The Mass, Confession, and Food Laws

Article XXIV addresses the mass. The Lutherans did not abolish it — they reformed it. They rejected the idea that the mass is a sacrifice that merits grace, but retained the Lord's Supper as a gift, with preaching in the vernacular and congregational participation. Article XXV concerns private confession, which the Lutherans retained but freed from the requirement to enumerate every sin. Article XXVI addresses the use of food laws and fasting as meritorious works.

Articles XXVII–XXVIII: Monastic Vows and Episcopal Power

Article XXVII addresses monastic vows. The Lutherans rejected the idea that monastic life is a higher spiritual state than ordinary Christian life in the world. Vows that bind people to something beyond what Scripture requires are not binding on the conscience. Article XXVIII — the longest article — addresses the power of bishops. The Confession distinguishes sharply between spiritual authority (preaching and sacraments) and civil authority, and denies that bishops have the right to bind consciences with human laws.

Reform, Not Revolution

What strikes the reader of these seven articles is their moderation. The Lutherans were not trying to destroy the church — they were trying to remove specific abuses that had developed over centuries. They appealed not to novelty but to Scripture and early church practice. The Reformation, as the Augsburg Confession presents it, was a reform from within the tradition, not a departure from it.

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the main abuses that triggered the Protestant Reformation?

The Protestant Reformation was catalyzed by a cluster of practices in the late medieval Roman Catholic Church that Reformers argued distorted or contradicted the gospel. The most prominent were the sale of indulgences (which Luther attacked in his 1517 Ninety-Five Theses), the doctrine that the Mass is a sacrifice that re-presents Christ's atoning work, mandatory clerical celibacy, withholding the communion cup from the laity, the adoration of images and relics as meritorious, compulsory confession to a priest, and the elevation of papal and conciliar authority above Scripture. These seven abuses were addressed directly in Part II of the Augsburg Confession (1530) under Articles XXII–XXVIII.

Why did the Reformers object to indulgences specifically?

The Reformers objected to indulgences because the system implied that the church could transfer temporal punishment for sin from the treasury of merits accumulated by Christ and the saints, making forgiveness something that could be bought rather than received freely through faith. Luther's Ninety-Five Theses (1517) were sparked by the preaching of Johann Tetzel in Germany, who was selling indulgences to fund the construction of St. Peter's Basilica in Rome. Luther's primary objection was theological: indulgences implied that human beings could contribute to their justification through financial transactions, directly contradicting the gospel of free grace received through faith alone.

What did the Reformers object to about the Mass?

The Reformers' central objection to the late medieval Mass was the doctrine of transubstantiation and the teaching that the priest re-offers Christ as a propitiatory sacrifice each time the Mass is celebrated. Luther, Calvin, and other Reformers argued that Hebrews 9–10 teaches that Christ offered Himself once for all on the cross, making any re-offering a blasphemous denial of the finished work of Calvary. The Augsburg Confession (1530) and the Smalcald Articles (1537) both address this, with Luther calling the Mass-as-sacrifice 'the greatest and most horrible abomination' of the papacy.

Did the Catholic Church reform itself in response to the Protestant objections?

Yes, the Council of Trent (1545–1563) was the Roman Catholic Church's comprehensive response to the Reformation, addressing both the theological disputes and the genuine pastoral abuses that had fueled Protestant criticism. Trent reformed the practice of indulgences by restricting monetary transactions and requiring preaching; mandated better training for priests through seminaries; regularized catechesis; and addressed moral laxity among clergy. However, on the central theological disputes—justification, Scripture's authority, the Mass, and the papacy—Trent largely reaffirmed traditional Catholic positions while clarifying and systematizing them, making reconciliation with the Reformers impossible.

Were all of the Reformation's objections to Rome valid?

Most Protestant and many Catholic historians today acknowledge that several of the Reformers' objections pointed to genuine abuses that needed correction, particularly the commercialization of indulgences, clerical ignorance, and moral corruption among some clergy and bishops. Where Protestant and Catholic historians still differ is on whether the theological objections—particularly regarding justification, the authority of Scripture, and the nature of the Mass—were fair interpretations of authoritative Catholic teaching or caricatures of popular distortions. The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (1999), signed by Lutherans and Catholics, represents significant progress in resolving the central theological dispute of the Reformation, though important differences remain.

Free Creed Study Resources

Sign up for our occasional email: Christian Creed Study Resources. Get exclusive study guides, book lists, and updates from our academic network.